Weekly Wrap April 7: Solo Diners, Uber-OpenTable Partnership, and More

The most important hospitality industry news right now

In this Weekly Wrap, we’re looking at hospitality at upscale bars, the operator dilemma of solo diners, tariffs, and more.

Hooters Bankruptcy

The Headline: “Hooters files for bankruptcy”

The Source: CNN

What You Need to Know:

Hooters — the restaurant chain first known for its orange-clad, all-female wait staff and then its chicken wings — filed for bankruptcy, the company announced Monday. But the decades-old brand said it isn’t going anywhere.

In the bankruptcy process, the company plans to sell all of its 100 company-owned restaurants to two franchisee groups that operate Hooters locations in the Tampa, Florida, and Chicago areas. The combined group collectively operates a third of the US franchised-owned locations, according to the press release.

Hooters joins other fast-casual restaurants, such as BurgerFi and Red Lobster, which filed for bankruptcy amid rough business conditions. The company’s workforce has also come under fire, with lawsuits ranging from racial discrimination to gender discrimination. Hooters closed dozens of restaurants last year, blaming rising food and labor costs.

Hooters said it will continue to operate its business as usual, although it said it is “evaluating the Company’s operational footprint” for its company-owned locations. That means it may end up closing some locations during its bankruptcy process. Private equity firms Nord Bay Capital and TriArtisan Capital Advisors bought Hooters in 2019.

The buyer group includes the original Hooters founders, including Neil Kiefer, CEO of franchisee group Hooters Inc.

“For many years now, the Hooters brand has been owned by private equity firms and other groups with no history or experience with the Hooters brand,” Kiefer said in a press release Monday. In an interview with Bloomberg News last week, he said that the turnaround plan includes making the chain more family friendly.

Our Take:

For those worried that Hooters is disappearing, fret not. Some of the more experienced franchisees are stepping in to steer the ship. But this isn’t really about Hooters filing for bankruptcy — it's about who owned them when they did.

In 2024 alone, 21 restaurant and bar chains filed for bankruptcy. Ten of those were backed by private equity firms. Once again, private equity is the loser here (though they probably still made their money on the way in or out), because many of these firms don’t actually understand how to run restaurants. Or worse, like last year’s big bankruptcy, Red Lobster, they strip the assets, cash out, and use bankruptcy as the exit strategy. It’s a cautionary tale, sure, but it won’t stop private equity money from flowing into the space.

Hooters isn’t going anywhere. With seasoned operators taking over, there’s no doubt it’ll remain a fixture in plenty of markets. We’re definitely skeptical of the push to make it more “family friendly” — but hey, if they can pull it off, more power to them. (Still not sure I’d bring my kids there…)

Solo Dining

The Headline: “Why Is Dining Alone So Difficult?”

The Source: The New York Times

What You Need to Know:

This is part of the paradox of solo dining. Even as Americans are spending more time on their own, many find eating out alone to be rife with awkwardness and judgment. And many restaurateurs, who already run their businesses on thin profit margins, worry that tables for one will cost them.

Reservations for solo dining in the United States have risen by 64 percent since 2019, according to data from OpenTable, and 21 percent from 2022 to 2023, according to Resy. The increase in eating alone is probably even greater, given that many people simply walk in.

Several diners described the experience of entering a restaurant hoping to treat themselves to a relaxing meal, then feeling guilty for taking up space, or fearful that they’re being judged by everyone around them.

“When you walk in by yourself, the look on the host or hostess’s face changes,” said Rajika Shah, a lawyer in Los Angeles who used to dine alone frequently, as she moved often for work and wanted to explore local dining. “It is sometimes a look of panic, like ‘What are we going to do with this person?’ Or sometimes it is a look of sympathy.”

Ms. Shah, 51, said she is often led to the worst table in the dining room, neglected by her server, and then rushed out at the end of the meal. She blamed the tipping system — because workers are reliant on tips, she said, they may be less attentive to those who spend less than groups.

“I am just so tired of being treated like a second-class citizen,” she said.

Even the menu can feel exclusionary: The shareable small plates that dominate many menus make it expensive and “difficult to eat a balanced and well-proportioned meal alone,” said Amanda Lao, 55, who lives in Chicago and started solo dining while traveling for her former job as an auditor.

Our Take:

As a consumer, I love dining out alone, and I love sitting at the bar — unless I’m working, in which case, I want a table. As an operator, I also love solo diners, but I understand the dilemma for restaurateurs who want to maximize every square inch of real estate.

That said, I don’t love the idea that the “default option” for most solo diners is the bar. While I personally love it, some people just don’t. Some guests want a table. A friend of mine in Atlanta eats out solo all the time but hates sitting at the bar. Her reasoning? “I want to eat, I want a drink, I want to be around people... but I don’t want to get stuck in a bar conversation with the bartender or the person next to me.” She wants to be alone in a crowd — something we’re seeing more and more of.

Here’s the takeaway: Solo diners who feel appreciated — not pitied or seen as an inconvenience — tend to be some of the most loyal customers. Over time, they often outspend many other guests, and even better, they start bringing in friends and turning them into regulars, too.

Embrace the solo diner, appreciate them, give them the love they deserve.

The ‘Too Good For You’ Dilemma

The Headline: “Upscale Bars Have a Hospitality Problem”

The Source: Wine Enthusiast

What You Need to Know:

When I visited New York from Los Angeles in January, I dropped by a buzzy new bar in Midtown Manhattan with great anticipation. The place looks stunning in photos and is featured on all the best new bars list.

However, its sizzle devolved to fizzle the moment I sat down. Some of the details that make or break a good experience were missing. 

Despite these pluses, the place left me cold because it felt less like a bar and more like a destination serving drinks—a critical distinction, in my mind. The former is a place with good drinks and warm hospitality; the latter is a spectacle and as the cocktail scene moves forward, I know these types of venues will likely launch with greater frequency. Their visually distinct atmospheres and elaborate drinks will cajole the Instagram and TikTok crowds to eagerly book 90-minute reservation weeks in advance. 

But where exactly do these upscale places mean for the future of the bar landscape?

Is an Upscale Bar Even a Bar?

The line separating a classic bar and a high-end destination bar points to the cocktail scene’s evolution. Classic cocktails on the menu were a mark of distinction years ago. Not anymore. To stand out, and stay competitive in a crowded landscape, an establishment may feel the need to lean into elements that make space a destination, where near $30 drinks can be justified. 

This mindset is not unlike restaurants. The three-Michelin star spot and the mom-and-pop greasy spoon technically fit under the same restaurant umbrella, but they’re viewed through different filters. It feels like the time is right to apply those filters to the bar industry.

Our Take:

There is definitely a hospitality problem in bars. Some of the best bars in every town across the U.S. have this issue — and plenty of mediocre bars do too. But there’s a difference: some of the high-end spots have great cocktails, and they know it. Their service is impeccable (and remember, service and hospitality are very different things), the design is beautiful. But do I leave feeling warm and fuzzy? No.

But are these types of places really meant to be warm and fuzzy, or deeply hospitable? Probably not. Alinea in Chicago is an incredible restaurant — at one point arguably the best in the world. The service is pristine, the food is thoughtful and wildly creative. But am I embraced or made to feel comfortable while I’m there? Definitely not. They are hospitable — just not in the way many of us define or expect hospitality to be. But I don’t go there for that, I go for everything else. I’ve been once and maybe if I’m blessed I’ll go again in my lifetime; that place is one in a million.

Same goes for the now defunct Milk & Honey, the NYC forerunner of the speakeasy revival. I didn’t go there expecting great hospitality — and I definitely didn’t receive it. I went for a specific reason, to get great cocktails,  and I didn’t go often. That doesn’t mean I was treated poorly — I wasn’t — but I didn’t always feel welcome and wanted.

Bars like the ones mentioned in the article absolutely have a place. There’s something to be said for the quality of product they put out. But the bar that can offer both — high quality and true hospitality — that’s the kind of place consumers will treat like a temple.

Uber x OpenTable Partnership

The Headline: “Uber and OpenTable Announce Strategic Global Partnership to Enhance Dining Experience for Millions of Consumers”

The Source: Business Wire

What You Need to Know:

Uber (NYSE: UBER) and OpenTable (part of Booking Holdings Inc., NASDAQ: BKNG), global leaders in transportation and restaurant tech, have formed a new strategic partnership to provide seamless dining experiences for millions of highly engaged consumers around the world. The first-of-its-kind collaboration will pair Uber’s ride-hailing and delivery services with OpenTable’s expansive restaurant network across the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Mexico, Australia and Ireland.

In the months ahead, the companies will develop integrations of the Uber Eats, Uber, and OpenTable apps to offer dining reservation access and seamless transportation options, membership benefits, and more. And for the more than 1 million restaurants worldwide that partner with the companies, the collaboration between two trusted platforms brings additional opportunities to drive revenue, engage existing diners—and reach new ones.

Our Take:

Ugh. Two big players teaming up to grab even more market share. Will this help owners? Maybe. The only thing that’s clear right now is that Uber and OpenTable are coordinating to connect a ride with a reservation. That’s cool. But the real question is: How does this benefit restaurant owners?

Most of the press I’ve seen focuses on how this makes the consumer experience more seamless — especially if you're not the one driving. But nothing I’ve seen really touches the restaurant side. And let’s be honest: when big tech makes something “seamless,” there’s usually a cost getting passed along. So, who eats it? The customer? The restaurant? We don’t know yet.

There’s likely some long-game strategy here involving Uber Eats and OpenTable, though nothing’s been announced about fees or what that integration might actually look like. I think whether this works depends a lot on OpenTable’s reach in urban markets and Uber’s availability in smaller ones. OpenTable’s lost serious ground over the past few years to Resy, Tock, and SevenRooms in major cities, and getting an Uber in some smaller markets is a game of roulette at times (on a recent visit to Cincinnati, I waited no fewer than 20 minutes for one).

In a year, we’ll either be talking about this as a massive win, or a press release no one remembers. Only time will tell.

More Tariffs

The Headline: “President Trump's sweeping new tariffs create more potential disruption for restaurants”

What You Need to Know:

President Trump announced a sweeping set of tariffs on countries around the world on Wednesday, setting the stage for a global trade war and adding a new set of disruptions for a restaurant industry that is already combatting a shaky economic outlook. 

The Administration announced a set of reciprocal tariffs on trading partners of at least 10%, with some key exceptions for countries such as Russia and Cuba that are already facing broad sanctions. 

The new import taxes are designed to eliminate trade imbalances between the U.S. and other countries, and Trump argues that many other nations have tougher trade restrictions than does the U.S. The administration argues that trade deficits increased by over 40% over the past five years, ultimately hurting domestic manufacturing capacity. The tariffs vary by country, based on individual trade imbalances, and are as high as 50%. 

But tariffs are import taxes on goods imported into the U.S., and are typically paid by companies importing those goods. Those companies typically pass those tariffs onto their customers, driving up the cost of those goods. 

For restaurants, which import a range of goods such as wine from France or kitchen equipment from Vietnam, the result adds a layer of cost uncertainty at a time when much of the industry is working to regain consumer traffic. 

“Applying new tariffs at this scale will create change and disruption that restaurant operators will have to navigate to keep their restaurants open,” Michelle Korsmo, CEO of the National Restaurant Association, said in a statement. “The biggest concerns for restaurant operators—from community restaurants to national brands—are that tariffs will hike food and packaging costs and add uncertainty to managing availability, while pushing up prices for consumers.”

Our Take:

Get ready, folks, because the next four years are going to be a roller coaster. The past three months have shown that the only predictable policy with this administration is its unpredictability. Restaurateurs are going to have to deal with that reality.

Now is the time to be innovative and think on your toes. The first two years of the pandemic felt a lot like this: uncertainty, confusion, anger. Yes, many places didn’t make it through — but many did. Some even thrived. And they did it through creativity, agility, and sheer force of will.

The tariffs are brutal for restaurants across the country. But like it or not, we’ve got to figure out how to thrive in spite of them.

Bonus Reads